Recently an
article came out (HERE) that the Associated Press had
released a photo (HERE) of a soldier dying against the will of the family and Defense Secratary Robert Gates. According to the article; AP's statement in favor of running it said they wanted, "to make public an image that conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it."
The conflict is not uncommon and just maybe, in this particular circumstance, a different Lance Corporal's photograph could have been chosen. However, for a moment, I would like to discuss the decision that the Associate Press made, even defend it.
Working in the media requires a level of editorial judgment or knowing when to use propriety. At the same time; why is it that the current society, particularly in America, is so afraid of the truth?
Looking at the photo itself, I see the grimness of war, I see a slightly blurred picture of a soldier dying for what is right- standing for the very thing we take for granted in this country: freedom. I also see someone I wish could have made it home before this scene happened. For soldiers, for civilians- war is torturous. It's real and it's not pretty. War is hell.
I have seen
worse. I have heard worse. And while there are images I probably wish I had not seen, I know that being educated to the world around me gives me a much more realistic perspective. The media cuts it out and American society hides from it.
During the Viet Nam war: it was the rise and expansion for the media in ways that had never been seen before. While there were images that were harsh or even tasteless, there were many more that needed to be seen- the public was interested, the public found their voice- through the images. Today- it's numbers, it's the "regular news of war" that are regularly reported...it is quickly dismissed, and even becomes the subject of annoyance for some who would prefer the fluff.
Again, perhaps at the family's request; the Associated Press could have not used that particular photo. BUT~ AP has thousands of photos they could use...and I DO applaud their expression of their First Amendment right: freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom to tell the truth. Those who are dying need a voice as much as those who live. To tell the story of someone who would otherwise have no say- to be a journalist- carries a great weight, carries a great responsibility, carries a duty, to defy the odds of status quo and tell the truth.
Aftermath, my friends, is boring and complacent. Death, life, struggle, succession....being in the midst of these things- these are thrilling- for better or worse, these are the truth.